A general theory of learning and teaching and a related comprehensive set of performance indicators for higher education institutions     

Theodor Leiber 《Quality in Higher Education》2019,25(1):76-97

In contemporary knowledge societies, performance indicators are an indispensable element of sustainable quality management and enhancement through monitoring and evaluating quality performance of higher education institutions. It is argued that learning and teaching quality in higher education should be approached in a holistic way, namely across the four subdomains of learning and teaching environment, teaching processes, learning processes and learning outcomes and their assessment. performance indicators related to these areas must align with a synoptic understanding of learning and teaching comprising behavioural, information processing, cognitive, social (constructivism) and humanistic theories of learning. Selected issues from a comprehensive set of about 280 performance indicators for learning and teaching are presented and contextualised. The indicators set resulted and emerged from critical reflection of research literature and explorative surveys of various informed and engaged stakeholders, from 14 public European universities, and a general theory of learning and teaching.  相似文献   

高职学生在线学习投入量表构建与实证分析     

刘超  王召义  江芳 《天津市教科院学报》2021,(2):57-63

学生的学习行为投入是影响学习效果的重要因素。为了了解疫情防控期间高职学生在线学习行为投入现状,在学习行为投入、在线学习行为投入内涵界定及测量研究的基础上设计了6个维度的高职学生在线学习行为投入测量量表,并基于学校电子商务学院2018级237名学生在安徽省网络课程学习中心(e会学)平台上进行在线学习的系统后台数据以及课后针对学习过程调查的问卷数据,对20个测量指标进行描述性分析、阶段性变化分析以及与终局性在线考试成绩进行相关分析。最后提出有效激发学生在线学习行为投入的实践启示,包括强化线上教学的过程管理;丰富线上教学设计,激发学生学习积极性;坚持线上教学的高要求。  相似文献   

信号处理中的数据压缩评价指标研究   总被引：1，自引：0，他引：1  

高永丽 《楚雄师范学院学报》2008,23(3)

数据压缩的最终目标就是在不损失或尽量少损失有用信息的前提下,获得尽可能大的压缩比.而压缩算法的优劣,则是通过压缩性能指标进行评价的,本文阐述了各种压缩指标在评价压缩算法上的应用和特点  相似文献   

中国高校分类标准及指标体系设计   总被引：7，自引：0，他引：7  

CHEN Hou-feng 《高等教育研究》2008,(6)

高校分类标准是指用来区分高校性质、任务、能级的准则和参照系,是用于判断高校类型和层次的定性化尺度;高校分类指标是指在分类标准基础上用于测量或反映高校性质、任务、能级及发展现状的数量指征。高校分类标准及指标,应当从输入、多元的视角来设计。本文尝试从培养目标及学科专业、人才培养、科学研究、社会服务、学生成份、教师队伍、经济(地理)区域、宏观管理等八个维度,来设计中国高校的多元分类标准及指标体系。  相似文献   

Toward a taxonomy of entrepreneurship education research literature: A bibliometric mapping and visualization     

《Educational Research Review》2019

The retrospective amount of research literature dedicated to entrepreneurship education (EE) is overwhelming, which makes producing an overview difficult. However, advanced bibliometric mapping and clustering techniques can help visualize and structure complex research literature. Thus, the objective of this mapping study is to systematically explore and cluster the EE research literature to deliver a taxonomic scheme that can serve as a basis for future research. The analyzed data, which were drawn from the Web of Science and Scopus, consist of 1773 peer-reviewed documents published between 1975 and 2014. On the one hand, this taxonomy should create stronger ties to educational research; on the other, it can foster international research collaboration to boost both interdisciplinary EE and its impact on a global basis. This work reinforces our understanding of current EE research by identifying and distilling the most powerful intellectual relationships among its contributions and contributors. Consequently, this study addresses not only the academic community but also entrepreneurship educators and policymakers in an effort to boost entrepreneurial spirit, design effective policy instruments, and, ultimately, improve societal welfare.  相似文献   

Measuring scientific contributions with modified fractional counting     

Gunnar Sivertsen  Ronald Rousseau  Lin Zhang 《Journal of Informetrics》2019,13(2):679-694

We develop and propose a new counting method at the aggregate level for contributions to scientific publications called modified fractional counting (MFC). We show that, compared to traditional complete-normalized fractional counting, it eliminates the extreme differences in contributions over time that otherwise occur between scientists that mainly publish alone or in small groups and those that publish with large groups of co-authors. As an extra benefit we find that scientists in different areas of research turn out to have comparable average contributions to scientific articles. We test the method on scientists at Norway’s largest universities and find that, at an aggregate level, it indeed supports comparability across different co-authorship practices as well as between areas of research. MFC is thereby useful whenever the research output from institutions with different research profiles are compared, as e.g., in the Leiden Ranking. Finally, as MFC is actually a family of indicators, depending on a sensitivity parameter, it can be adapted to the circumstances.  相似文献   

Rooted citation graphs density metrics for research papers influence evaluation     

Christos Giatsidis  Giannis Nikolentzos  Chenhui Zhang  Jie Tang  Michalis Vazirgiannis 《Journal of Informetrics》2019,13(2):757-768

Traditionally, citation count has served as the main evaluation measure for a paper's importance and influence. In turn, many evaluations of authors, institutions and journals are based on aggregations upon papers (e.g. h-index). In this work, we explore measures defined on the citation graph that offer a more intuitive insight into the impact of a paper than the superficial count of citations. Our main argument is focused on the identification of influence as an expression of the citation density in the subgraph of citations built for each paper. We propose two measures that capitalize on the notion of density providing researchers alternative evaluations of their work. While the general idea of impact for a paper can be viewed as how many researchers have shown interest to a piece of work, the proposed measures are based on the hypothesis that a piece of work may have influenced some papers even if they do not contain references to that piece of work. The proposed measures are also extended to researchers and journals.  相似文献   

本科教学评估症结的改革     

柳友荣 《大学.研究与评价》2008,(10):22-25

我国高等教育评估经历了试点实验,全面展开两个阶段,现已取得阶段性成效。针对当前我国高等教育评估的症结,应该速择以下路径进行改革:加强高等教育的分层研究;用法规规范评估活动;发挥核心利益相关者的作用;形成我国新的高等教育评估主体;注意评估方式选择与评估定位的一致;推动评估专家队伍的认证。  相似文献   

国外远程教育研究的重点和发展趋势——基于国外远程教育研究成果的定量分析     

刘艳华  华薇娜 《现代远程教育研究》2011,(4):51-55

ERIC数据库是教育领域中最大、最负盛名的国际级教育类资料库。ERIC数据库收录的远程教育类研究成果始于1972年,截至2010年,共12402篇文献。这些文献通过文献计量分析发现：国外远程教育研究已步入研究成果产出相对稳定的成熟期;文献来源渠道众多,以学术期刊为主;文献类型丰富,以期刊论文和研究报告为主;研究内容广泛,教育层次、教学设计、教学方法、相关技术的研究以及技术在远程教育中的应用研究一直是该领域的重点研究内容。当前国外远程教育的应用已经发展到大学以及研究生教育,研究逐渐向传统教育转变,开始关注教育政策、师生关系、互动、混合学习以及新技术在远程教育中的应用。  相似文献   

Changes in Lithuanian Pre-school and Pre-primary Education Quality Over the Last Decade     

Ona Monkeviciene  Kristina Stankeviciene 《美中教育评论》2011,(1):119-130

  相似文献